Synthetic Red Team-as-a-Service · In development · requesting early-access design partners

We attack your CFO with the same Hinglish deepfake stack
that's already hitting them in the wild.

Your CEO's voice is on every Q-call recording. Your CFO's face is on every LinkedIn live. Our target is under 4 hours to clone both using a HeyGen + voice-clone pipeline, build a multi-channel attack across WhatsApp, email and direct call — and walk into your finance team's helpdesk speaking Hinglish.

Then we hand you the report — mapped to CERT-In categories, ready for your audit committee — and you fix what we found before someone with worse intent does the same thing for ₹5,000 of compute.

Request early access See sample CERT-In report
⚠ The 7-day kill chain — what we deliver, end to end

From scrape to signed board report — under one week.

PHASE 1
Day 1
OSINT + footage scrape
CEO/CFO public videos · earnings calls · LinkedIn Live · YouTube interviews
PHASE 2
Day 2
Synthetic asset build
HeyGen avatar clone · ElevenLabs voice clone · Hindi/Marathi/Tamil/Bengali variants
PHASE 3
Days 3-4
Multi-channel attack
WhatsApp BEC · vendor invoice fraud · vishing call to treasury · helpdesk pretext
PHASE 4
Day 5
Containment + debrief
Live walkthrough with infosec · which controls held · which broke · why
PHASE 5
Days 6-7
Board report + remediation
CERT-In-mapped findings · DPDP §8(6) drill log · prioritised fix list · 30-day re-test
Three engagement tiers

Pilot to enterprise, priced for India, billed in INR.

All tiers include the 7-day SLA, board-ready CERT-In report, and 30-day re-test. The differences: number of personas attacked, channel coverage, language coverage, and depth of post-engagement training.

TIER · 01
Pilot Engagement
First-time engagement · single executive · single channel
₹15 Lper engagement
7-day SLA · 1 executive cloned · WhatsApp + email
Start pilot →
  • 1 executive (CEO or CFO) — voice + video clone
  • Hindi + English attack
  • Two channels: WhatsApp BEC + email phishing
  • Two attack vectors: vendor invoice fraud + wire-transfer pretext
  • Board-ready CERT-In-mapped report (PDF)
  • 2-hour live debrief with infosec team
  • 30-day remediation re-test (1 channel)
  • ₹15 L credits to annual Synthetic Shield contract
TIER · 03
Enterprise Engagement
Annual retainer · full board exposure · multi-region
₹40 Lper engagement
7-day SLA · 5+ personas · 4 quarterly engagements: ₹1.4 cr/yr
Plan annual →
  • 5+ personas: full C-suite + treasury + IT + select board
  • Hindi + English + 4 regional languages (Marathi/Tamil/Bengali/Gujarati)
  • All channels + branch / RM / customer-facing pretexts
  • Multi-region attack (HQ + 2 zonal offices)
  • 10+ attack vectors incl. M&A pretext, regulator impersonation
  • Quarterly cadence (4 engagements/yr)
  • Dedicated red-team channel partner
  • Tabletop exercise with audit committee
  • Annual bundle: ₹1.4 cr (saves ₹20 L)
  • Live data feed into Synthetic Exposure Score (Module 03)
What you get

Eight deliverables. Every engagement.

Standardised across tiers — what changes is depth, persona count, and language coverage. Nothing changes about quality of the artefacts.

📄
Board-ready PDF report
30-50 pages, CERT-In-mapped, DPDP-aware, audit-committee-ready format. Executive summary + per-vector breakdown + remediation matrix.
🎬
Attack artefact archive
Every deepfake video, voice file, message thread we used — encrypted, watermarked, evidence-vault-ready. You own them; we delete originals.
🛡️
Detection signature pack
YARA rules, email-header heuristics, voiceprint hashes — fed straight into your Mail / SOC shields if you're an Aria customer.
📋
Remediation matrix
Every finding ranked by exploitability × business impact. Owners assigned, fix-effort sized, deadline proposed. Tracked to closure.
🎓
Awareness training pack
Anonymised attack videos repackaged as training material for your finance + treasury teams. India-specific, Hinglish-narrated.
⚖️
CERT-In drill log
Annexure-II draft as if the attack had succeeded. Proves drill happened — counts toward your annual cyber-audit obligation under CERT-In Sept-2025 directive.
🔄
30-day re-test
We come back 30 days later with new attack vectors against the same controls — proves remediation actually held, not just got deployed.
🎙️
Audit-committee briefing
Optional 45-min board readout. We present, you ask, infosec answers. Most boards have never seen a live deepfake of their own CEO until this.
7-day SLA · industry's typical 21-day

Why we ship in a week when consultants take three.

Most red-team firms hand-craft each engagement by hand. Our plan is to automate the asset-build pipeline so the SLA below is real, not aspirational — the timeline shown is our engineering target for launch, not a track record yet.

PhaseAria SLATypical consulting firmWhy we're faster
OSINT + footage scrapeDay 1 (8 h)Days 1-3Automated CT-log + LinkedIn + YouTube ingestion
Voice + video cloneDay 2 (24 h)Days 4-7Target: automated HeyGen + voice-clone pipeline (in development)
Multi-channel attackDays 3-4Days 8-14Pre-built attack scripts in Hindi/Marathi/Tamil/Bengali
Board report draftDays 5-6Days 15-19Claude agent drafts CERT-In template; humans review
Final delivery + debriefDay 7Days 20-21Single dedicated engagement lead, no agency layering
Report template · CERT-In Annexure-II format

What your audit committee will read.

The exact format we deliver. Sections, vector taxonomy, finding structure, and SLA framework are fixed; contents below are template placeholders until the engagement runs against your tenant.

aria-redteam · TEMPLATE · annexure-ii.draft.txt REPORT TEMPLATE
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ CERT-IN ANNEXURE-II · DRILL LOG · TEMPLATE ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Engagement ID : [auto-assigned at kickoff] Tenant : [your org · sector · HQ city] Engagement lead : Aria Red Team Period : [start date] → [start + 7 days] Authorisation : Mutual NDA + signed RoE (Sections 2-3 of RoE) Status : DRILL — no real incident filed with CERT-In ─── Section 1 · Incident category (CERT-In schema) ───────────── Category-VI : Identity theft, spoofing & phishing attacks Sub-class : Synthetic-media / deepfake-enabled BEC Vectors run : [selected from RoE Section 3 — voice clone, video clone, vendor-invoice, helpdesk pretext, payroll change, etc.] ─── Section 2 · Findings (structure shown · contents per drill) ─ F-00X CRITICAL [vector summary] · [control that failed] · [fix proposed] Owner: [role] · SLA: 14 days F-00X HIGH [vector summary] · [partial-hold detail] · [fix proposed] Owner: [role] · SLA: 30 days F-00X LOW [vector summary] · [control held / observation only] Each finding includes: • Vector (which attack ran) • Control matrix mapping • Result (held / partial / failed) • Owner + SLA • Reproduction steps for re-test • Remediation acceptance criteria ─── Section 3 · Containment + remediation summary ───────────── Total findings : [counted at delivery] Critical SLA : 14 days from drill end High SLA : 30 days Re-test scheduled : drill end + 30 days (included in fee) ─── Section 4 · Affected systems / IOCs ────────────────────── - [systems touched, scoped strictly to RoE Section 2] - Aria-owned synthetic comms infra (numbers, domains — listed) - Any typosquat / pretext domains stood up (taken down at engagement end) ─── Section 5 · Drill artefacts (encrypted vault) ──────────── vault://[engagement_id]/voice_clone_[exec].wav (audio · ElevenLabs) vault://[engagement_id]/video_clone_[exec].mp4 (video · HeyGen) vault://[engagement_id]/whatsapp_threads.json (per channel) vault://[engagement_id]/email_threads.eml (per pretext) Originals deleted at T+30; watermarked artefacts retained 7 years. ─── Section 6 · Submission status ──────────────────────────── CERT-In filing : N/A — engagement is a drill, not a real incident Drill log retained : 7 years (DPDP §8(6) lookback) Audit committee brief : optional 45-min readout (Tier 3 included) ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Generated by Aria CyberShield Red Team · per-engagement vault Every drill log is HMAC-signed and hash-chained for ledger integrity ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

In development · requesting early-access design partners.

This service is not yet live — we're building it out and looking for a small number of founding design partners to help shape the engagement model before general availability. Tell us your org and timeline and we'll follow up as the offering comes online.

Request early access See full Synthetic Shield